четверг, 27 сентября 2012 г.

Paper Writing Services - Affordable Customized Contents

Paper writing service providers usually help individuals save a lot of time when they are trying to beat deadlines. There are many companies and individuals who offer the services of writing the papers at a fee. Some of them are companies that offer the full time paper writing services while some of the individuals offer the services as a part time work. The services offered are usually of great to the students who are too busy to complete their papers on time. They therefore charge a fee for the service. Since this is a profession for many, the price charged may be high. Much time is needed in carrying out the research and they would charge a lot. It is possible to enjoy the paper-writing-service.net discounts. They help save a lot especially since most of them have no constant source of income.
The company has team of professional paper writers who have vast experience in writing in pretty much any topic. They help the students in writing a professionally researched paper enabling them meet deadlines set by their lecturers. They make sure that they are up to date with the most common and famous topic that are accepted by the professors. This means that one cannot fail to get what they might need in research.  While the research papers are the mostly provided writing service that they provide, they also offer other papers like essays, term papers, articles, theses, dissertations, case studies, book reports, speeches and bibliographies.
The paper writing service provider usually uses questionnaires which are used to gather data on the common research papers that are needed. The clients communicates with the company on the type of the paper they want written, the needed topic, the number of words and pages, time frame and any citations that are needed. The company usually issues the task of writing the paper needed to a professional writer who receives all the guidelines and the timeframe to hand in the researched paper. The company has professional writers who are well versed with different topics of writing and one will not fail to get a writer for the topic needed.
There are incidences where the customer is required to pay a higher amount of money to enable them hire the services of a writer with better credentials. The website also offers the option of uploading files, like specified materials of carrying out the research. This option is usually provided on the questionnaire form that the customer fills. The writer assigned the research paper is required to upload the given file and send it to the buyer. This is usually important as it help in checking the authenticity of the given research paper. There is nothing bad like receiving a plagiarized paper after paying a fortune.
Before hiring the service of any writing service provider, it is important to put several factors into consideration. One should first look at the rates that the writing service providing company. Companies offering the services at extremely low prices should be avoided as it might translate to low quality services. The writing service provider should also guaranteed that the work provide is original and not merely plagiarized.


paper-writing-service.net discounts
Why use the services of paper writers? When one has no adequate skills for writing the needed papers, they can hire the services of the writing services providers. These companies and individuals usually help one to get the needed grades in the particular project. The use of the services of the writers helps in reflecting that the students have a grasp of the needed skills in writing the project. Using of paper-writing-service.net discounts helps in saving a lot for the students.

вторник, 4 сентября 2012 г.

That conduct included a

United States
That conduct included a

from Hollywoodmafia by Jack Whalen


? ? ???


http://www.outofthelife.com/


If you are sick of the life get out!


The Blog is a constant barrage of tough guy talk. People would be shocked by what comes in on a daily basis. So many of these posts come from a bunch of young wannabee’s, yet I get some from guys who spent years away and bash me for my words. All a person has to do is read a newspaper and they will see my words are true.


Last week I posted up Peter Gotti’s appeal. The papers were regurgitating the same old tag line. He was trying to get his sentence lowered. The part that most of the people who read the blog missed was his lawyer. He did not have a high powered legal team working on his appeal.


No! Gone are the days when a Cutler or Shargel or any brilliant appellate lawyer would be working on his case. It was a Lawyer who works as a court appointed lawyer. Times are tough for the American LCN.


The Feds keep going after Baby Gotti because of his family. Not his father. No his sister! She thought it was a great idea to star in a show and show off her wealth.


I guess it is okay when your father started Microsoft or even a hotel chain. Oh wait a minute he was a gangster! Baby Gotti went in and tried to make a deal. I guess the Feds did not offer him what he was looking for or he would not be on trial today. The fact is he did the smart thing.


Then he did the dumb thing by pulling out.


The whole game is fixed. The only group who can win is the Government. So any smart crook knows where to go.


Look at the past, the founder of the American LCN Lucky Luciano worked with the Law.


The mighty Underboss of the Gambino Family, The mentor of John Gotti Neil Dellacroce was a longtime informant. Greg Scrapa, Whitey Bulger and that is the short list. Who knows how many more are out there today.


Joey Massino stepped up and took care of his blood family.


I heard these words, “I only turned rat because I found out my friends killed my best friend” Not only did they kill his best friend, they killed their own friend. This was a guy they grew up with. A guy who they should have stuck with until the end.


Yet they killed him for some slaps on the back and a few pennies. Things that mean nothing all these years later. What a waste.


People write that I must be crazy. I am not. I post it like I see.


I never feel bad about my choices in life. These guys did what they did on their own; I did not tell them to do a thing. They have a choice. Now they can do many years so they can come out a guys who have lived their lives can pat them on the back. Yeah you are a stand up guy.


The world passed them by and they are now big men in the four blocks of Brooklyn where they grew up. There is a world out there and Brooklyn is only a tiny slice.


So if a guy like Joe Campy wants to help guys get out of life, then I say it is a good thing!


I posted up some more stuff on youtube. Yes I stuck my camara in in Louie Caruso's face and Shakes Milano. I will post up Donnie's and it is close up!.


BREAKSHOTTV ON YOUTUBE.


Kenji OC


THE RAT!


The Double Life of a Don


Monday, Dec. 16, 1985


His name was Aniello Dellacroce, which in Italian means "little lamb of the cross," and he took pleasure in killing people. "He likes to peer into a victim's face, like some kind of dark angel, at the moment of death," a federal agent once said of the Mafia chieftain. As underboss of the Gambino clan, the most powerful of New York's five families, he was a member and chief enforcer of "the Commission," the 11-member council that reputedly oversees organized crime around the U.S. Occasionally disguised as a priest under the alias of Father O'Neill, a play on his first name, he traveled about the nation to impose edicts and settle disputes between rival Mafia clans.


Few mobsters dared to argue with him. Dellacroce, who died in his sleep in a New York City hospital last week at the age of 71, played another role as well: for almost two decades he was an informant for the FBI.


Though Dellacroce was not very forthcoming about his own crimes, he offered the feds a wealth of information about those committed by his enemies and the Commission. After Carlo Gambino, the capo di tutti capi (boss of bosses), died in 1976, Dellacroce told the FBI that another would-be godfather, Carmine Galante, had been marked for death. Dellacroce had reason to know: plans for the Galante hit were hatched in his own headquarters, the Ravenite Social Club in Manhattan's Little Italy.


The feds were able to isolate and protect Galante as long as he was in prison for parole violations, but after he was released in 1979 Galante was mowed down during an alfresco lunch in the backyard of a Brooklyn restaurant. Other information provided by Dellacroce gave the FBI leads on the still unsolved murder of Teamster Boss Jimmy Hoffa and helped break major narcotics cases, including the so-called Pizza Connection case against 22 U.S. and Sicilian mobsters for heroin trafficking.


Dellacroce's double life began one afternoon in the mid-1960s when a limousine swung up to the Ravenite Social Club. Out stepped a tall man in a somber suit carrying a Wall Street banker's briefcase. "Who's in charge here?" he demanded. Awed hoodlums ushered the uninvited guest to Dellacroce's table.


The bold stranger was an FBI agent named Pat Collins. Sitting down with Dellacroce, he began a slow courtship, gradually winning him over by convincing the wary Mafia leader that a private relationship with the federal authorities would not be a bad insurance policy in a high-risk career.


Unlike Teamster Union Boss Jackie Presser, who escaped prosecution on charges of padding union payrolls this year because he was an FBI informant, Dellacroce's cooperation did not keep him out of jail. In 1972 he was sentenced to five years in prison for income tax evasion. Collins had expected that one day Dellacroce would demand payment for his information, but that never happened. The veteran FBI agent died of a heart attack in 1980 at the age of 51. This year Dellacroce was ordered to stand trial on racketeering and conspiracy charges, along with ten other accused members of the Commission.


Whether he hoped the payment would come in the form of exoneration from those charges will probably never be known. Before the trial could begin, the bloodthirsty Little Lamb slipped from the grasp of federal prosecutors.


There is so much talk about being a rat or ratting on this blog it is funny. First so many guys are rats that you would be amazed. When I was in Brooklyn and wearing my wire the Feds had at least two other guys giving them info.


I know because many times when I went to get debriefed they told me what I had been saying and doing and this was before they downloaded my wire!


Most people have no idea what goes on in a criminal’s mind, so they have no basis in which to judge. Many guys will rat because they have no choice, many because they want to and others for every reason under the sun.


That conduct included a

More on Rats!


The smart criminals are rats. They already play outside the rules, so why would it come as a shock. They use it as a hedge against future problems, a way to even the playing field by getting rid of problems or just to gather intelligence against the other law enforcement sources or criminals.


So why does it come as a shock that so many guys rat?


I guess it is the steady diet of movies, TV shows and Books. The whole principle of the La Cosa Nostra is flawed. It assumes that men who live as outlaws will live under a new set of rules by a different governing body. Why would they?


These men are lawless outlaws. Today the LCN has lost its bite. They are all bark. The Feds can offer up a get out of jail free card and a new life. The LCN offers only Prison time.


The fear of being killed is no longer a major factor.


JOHN A. GOTTI,


a/k/a John, Jr., a/k/a Junior,


defendant herein, along with others, did knowingly, willfully and unlawfully combine,


conspire, confederate, and agree, together and with each other, and with persons


known and unknown to the Grand Jury to violate:


(a) Title 18, United States Code, Section 1962(c), that is, being


persons employed by and associated with the GCF Enterprise as


described above, which GCF Enterprise engaged in, and the


activities of which affected, interstate and foreign commerce, to


conduct and participate, directly and indirectly, in the conduct of the


affairs of the GCF Enterprise through a pattern of racketeering


activity as that term is defined in Title 18, United States Code,


Sections 1961(1) and (5), as set forth herein in paragraph 17, and


through the collection of unlawful debt, as that term is defined in


Title 18, United States Code, Section 1961(6), as set forth herein in


paragraph 18; and


(b) Title 18, United States Code, Section 1962(a), that is, to receive


any income derived, directly and indirectly, from a pattern of


racketeering activity as that term is defined in Title 18, United


States Code, Sections 1961(1) and (5), as set forth herein in


paragraph 17, and through the collection of unlawful debt, as that


term is defined in Title 18, United States Code, Section 1961(6), as


set forth herein in paragraph 18, in which the defendant


participated as a principal as that term is defined in Title 18, United


States Code, Section 2, and to use and invest, directly and


indirectly, any part of such income, and the proceeds of such


income, in acquisition of any interest in, and the establishment and


operation of, any enterprise (hereinafter referred to as an


"Investment Enterprise") which engaged in, and the activities of


which affected, interstate and foreign commerce.


That conduct included a

10


Page 11


E. The Pattern of Racketeering Activity


17. The pattern of racketeering activity, as defined in Title 18, United States


Code, Sections 1961(1) and (5), through which the defendant and his co-conspirators


agreed to conduct and participate in the conduct of the affairs of the GCF Enterprise,


and which generated income that was used and invested, at least in part, by the


defendant and his co-conspirators for the acquisition, establishment, and/or operation


of an investment Enterprise, consisted of multiple acts and threats involving:


(a) Murder, Attempted Murder and Conspiracy to Commit Murder, in


violation of New York Penal Law Articles 125, 110 and 105;


(b) Dealing in Controlled Substances and Listed Chemicals, Attempt to


Deal in Controlled Substances and Listed Chemicals and Conspiracy to Deal in


Controlled Substances and Listed Chemicals, in violation of Sections 893.13 and


777.04 Florida Statutes and New York Penal Law Articles 220, 110 and 105;


(c) Robbery, Attempted Robbery and Conspiracy to Commit Robbery,


in violation of Sections 812.13 and 777.04 Florida Statutes, and New York Penal Law


Articles 160, 110 and 105;


(d) Kidnapping, Attempted Kidnapping and Conspiracy to Commit


Kidnapping, in violation of New York Penal Law Articles 135, 110 and 105;


(e) Extortion, Attempted Extortion and Conspiracy to Commit Extortion,


in violation of Sections 836.05 and 777.04 Florida Statutes and New York Penal Law


Articles 155, 110 and 105;


(f) Bribery and Conspiracy to Commit Bribery, in violation of New York


Penal Law Articles 200 and 105;


11


Page 12


(g) Gambling, in violation of New York Penal Law, Article 225;


(h) Offenses involving the Distribution and Possession With Intent to


Distribute Controlled Substances, in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section


841, and Conspiracy to Distribute and to Possess With Intent to Distribute Controlled


Substances, in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 846; and acts which


are indictable under the following provisions:


(i) Interstate Travel in Aid of Racketeering Enterprises, in violation


Title 18, United States Code, Section 1952;


(j) Interstate Transportation of Stolen Property/Money, in violation of


Title 18, United States Code, Section 2314;


That conduct included a

(k) Receipt of Stolen Property/Money, in violation of Title 18, United


States Code, Section 2315;


(I) Bribery of Public Officials And Witnesses, in violation of Title 18,


United States Code, Section 201;


(m) Influencing or Injuring Officer or Juror Generally, in violation of Title


18, United State Code, Section 1503;


(n) Making Extortionate Extensions of Credit, in violation of Title 18,


United States Code, Section 892;


(o) Financing Extortionate Extensions of Credit, in violation of Title 18,


United States Code, Section 893;


(p) Collection of Extensions of Credit by Extortionate Means, in


violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 894;


(q) Possessing/Uttering Counterfeit Obligations or Securities, in


violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 472;


12


Page 13


(r) Dealing in Counterfeit Obligations or Securities, in violation of Title


18, United States Code, Section 473;


(s) Interference with Commerce by Threats and Violence, in violation


of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1951;


(t) Laundering of Monetary Instruments, in violation of Title 18, United


States Code, Section 1956; and


(u) Engaging in Monetary Transactions in Property Derived From


Specified Unlawful Activity, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957.


F- Collection of Unlawful Debt


18. The collection of unlawful debt through which the defendant and his co-


conspirators agreed to conduct and participate, directly and indirectly, in the conduct of


the affairs of the GCF Enterprise, and which generated income that was used and


invested, at least in part, by the defendant and his co-conspirators for the acquisition,


establishment, and/or operation of an Investment Enterprise, consisted of the collection


from various individuals of unlawful debts, as that term is defined in Title 18, United


States Code, Section 1961(6), that is, debts incurred or contracted in gambling activity


which was in violation of the law of the United States, a state or political subdivision


thereof, and which were incurred in connection with the business of gambling in


violation of the law of the United States, a state or political subdivision thereof, and


debts which were unenforceable under State or Federal law in whole or in part as to


United States

principal or interest because of the laws relating to usury, and which were incurred in


connection with the business of lending money at a rate usurious under State or


Federal law, where the usurious rate was at least twice the lawfully enforceable rate.


13


Page 14


G- The Methods And Means


19. It was part of the conspiracy that each member of the GCF Enterprise


would and did agree to participate in the affairs of the GCF Enterprise with the


knowledge and intent that a GCF Enterprise member would commit two or more acts of


racketeering activity, or participate in the collection of at least one unlawful debt, for and


on behalf of the GCF Enterprise.


20. It was further part of the conspiracy that GCF Enterprise members would


and did engage in an array of criminal conduct for and on behalf of the GCF Enterprise,


and/or to illegally generate income, including murder, robbery, bribery, kidnapping,


extortion, gambling, illegal drug trafficking, making extortionate extensions of credit,


collecting unlawful debts, illegally influencing jury members, illegally influencing victims


and witnesses of criminal conduct, burglary, home invasions, aggravated assaults and


batteries, and money laundering.


21. It was further part of the conspiracy that GCF Enterprise members would


and did engage in criminal conduct, such as the threatened and actual use of deadly


force and violence, designed to create and maintain fear and dread in others so that the


GCF Enterprise could defend and expand its unlawful dominion and influence in certain


geographical areas and over certain:


(i) legal businesses, such as the business of operating restaurants, the


business of operating bars/pubs, the business of providing bar security,


and the business of providing valet parking services;


(ii) legal industries, such as the construction and trucking industries;


14


Page 15


(Hi) unions' locals, and


(iv) illegal businesses, such as the business of illegally dealing in


controlled substances, the business of illegal gambling, and the business


of collection of unlawful debts.


22. It was further part of the conspiracy that GCF Enterprise members would


and did engage in criminal conduct designed to prevent government detection of GCF


Enterprise members' identities and illegal activities, and the location and amount of any


 Title United

resulting criminal proceeds, as well as criminal conduct designed to obstruct and


prevent the prosecution of any GCF Enterprise members. That conduct included a


commitment to (1) murdering persons, particularly members of the GCF Enterprise


and/or members and associates of other organized crime families, who were perceived


as potential witnesses against members of the GCF Enterprise, (2) corruptly


influencing, by bribery and/or threats, victims and witnesses of GCF Enterprise


members' criminal conduct, and (3) corruptly influencing, by bribery and/or threats,


jurors in state and/or federal proceedings involving GCF Enterprise members.


23. It was further part of the conspiracy that GCF Enterprise members, to


conceal the original illegal source of their criminal Income, would and did use and invest


some of the criminal income for the acquisition of interests in other businesses, or


Investment Enterprises, such as window/glass businesses, valet parking service


businesses, and commercial real estate businesses. Thereafter, the GCF Enterprise


members would and did use the proceeds from such other businesses, or Investment


Enterprises, for personal matters and for the operation of the other businesses, or


15


Page 16


Investment Enterprises, such as for improvements and for the payment of other


business-related expenses.


24. It was further part of the conspiracy that GCF Enterprise members would


and did force individuals who were illegally dealing in controlled substances in certain


areas of New York City to purchase their controlled substances from the GCF


Enterprise and/or to pay a tax to the GCF Enterprise to operate in said areas.


25. It was further part of the conspiracy that GCF Enterprise members would


and did assault any individuals who attempted to deal in controlled substances in


certain areas of New York City who refused to purchase their controlled substances


from the GCF Enterprise and/or to pay a tax to the GCF Enterprise.


26. It was further part of the conspiracy that GCF Enterprise members would


and did travel from New York City and elsewhere to the Middle District of Florida, the


Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, to commit various crimes involving the


threatened and actual use of deadly force and violence.


27. It was further part of the conspiracy that GCF Enterprise members would


and did engage in activity to establish and maintain GCF Enterprise footholds, or


operational bases, in various parts of the United States of America to further expand


the GCF Enterprises' criminal dominion and influence. In this regard, the members of


the GCF Enterprise would and did establish GCF Enterprise footholds in the city of


Tampa, Florida, in the Middle District of Florida, as well as other cities in the Southern


 Title United

District of Florida, and elsewhere.


16


Page 17


28. it was further part of the conspiracy that GCF Enterprise members would


and did engage in public acts and displays of violence, including shootings, stabbings,


baseball bat beatings, and murder, to create and maintain fear and dread in others.


29. It was further part of the conspiracy that GCF Enterprise members would


and did offer the Gambino Crime Family "umbrella," or protection, to individuals and


businesses from other individuals -- including other GCF Enterprise members, and from


other organizations, and competing interests, in exchange for monetary payments


and/or payments in kind, such as through engaging in or forgoing some particular


conduct or activity.


30. It was further part of the conspiracy that GCF Enterprise members would


and did facilitate the communication and exchange of information between incarcerated


GCF Enterprise members and non-incarcerated members concerning the GCF


Enterprise, its unlawful operations, and its members.


31. It was further part of the conspiracy that GCF Enterprise members would


and did participate in criminal activity on behalf of other members or associates of the


GCF Enterprise and/or with, and on behalf of, other members or associates of other La


Cosa Nostra Crime Families.


32. It was further part of the conspiracy that GCF Enterprise members would


and did transport to the State of New York, the State of Florida, and elsewhere,


property obtained by means of illegal activities in the State of New York, the State of


Florida, and elsewhere.


17


Page 18


H. Special Sentencing Allegations


Drug Trafficking


33. During the period of time alleged in Count One of this Indictment, in or


around New York City, defendant JOHN A. GOTTI, a/k/a John, Jr., a/k/a Junior, and


one or more members of the GCF Enterprise, knowingly and intentionally distributed


and possessed with intent to distribute five (5) kilograms or more of a mixture or


substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine, a controlled substance, all in


violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 841.


34. During the period of time alleged in Count One of this Indictment, in or


around New York City, defendant JOHN A. GOTTI, a/k/a John, Jr., a/k/a Junior, and


 Title United

one or more members of the GCF Enterprise, knowingly and intentionally conspired to


distribute and to possess with intent to distribute five (5) kilograms or more of a mixture


or substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine, a controlled substance, all in


violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 846.


Murder of George Grosso


35. On or about December 20, 1988, in New York City, the defendant,


JOHN A. GOTTI, a/k/a John, Jr., a/k/a Junior, together with others, with intent to


cause the death of George Grosso, caused his death, in violation of New York Penal


Law Articles 125.25(1) and 20.00.


Page 19


Murder of Louis DiBono


36. On or about October 4, 1990, in New York City, the defendant, JOHN A.


GOTTI, a/k/a John, Jr., a/k/a Junior, together with others, with intent to cause the


death of Louis DiBono, caused his death, in violation of New York Penal Law Articles


125.25(1) and 20.00.


Murder of Bruce John Gotterup


37. On or about November 20, 1991, in New York City, the defendant,


JOHN A. GOTTI, a/k/a John, Jr., a/k/a Junior, together with others, with intent to


cause the death of Bruce John Gotterup, caused his death, in violation of New York


Penal Law Articles 125.25(1) and 20.00.


All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1962(d).


Page 20


FORFEITURES


1. The allegations contained in Count One of this Indictment are hereby


realleged, and incorporated by reference herein as though fully set forth for the purpose


of alleging forfeiture pursuant to the provisions of Title 18, United States Code, Section


1963.


2. From his engagement in any and all of the offenses alleged in Count One


of this Indictment, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1962(d), involving


a conspiracy to violate Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1962(a) and 1962(c),


JOHN A. GOTTI,


a/k/a John, Jr., a/k/a Junior,


defendant herein, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to the provisions of Title


18, United States Code, Section 1963(a), all of his right, title, and interest in the


following:


(a) any interest he has acquired or maintained in violation of section


 Title United

1962;


(b) any —


(1) interest in;


(2) security of;


(3) claim against; or


(4) property or contractual right of any kind affording a source of


influence over;


any enterprise which he has established, operated, controlled, conducted,


or participated in the conduct of, in violation of section 1962; and


20


Page 21


(c) any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds


which he obtained, directly or indirectly, from racketeering


activity or unlawful debt collection in violation of section 1962.


3. Pursuant to the provisions of Title 18, United States Code, Section


1963(m), if any of the property described in subsection (a), as a result of any act or


omission of the defendant—


(a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;


(b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a


third party;


(c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;


(d) has been substantially diminished in value; or


(e) has been commingled with other property which cannot


be divided without difficulty;


the court shall order forfeiture of any other property of the defendant up to the value of


any property described in paragraph 2 of the forfeiture section of this Indictment.


A TRUE BILL,


Foreperson


ROBERT E. O'NEILL


United States Attorney


IBERir T. MONK


Deputy Chief, General Crimes Section


?Attorney


nited States Attorney


21


Apr 20, 2009 5:35 PM


Alternatively counsel requests that the Court direct that Mr

2001 Ross

from Hollywoodmafia by Jack Whalen


Every week it just gets better. More threats, more hate! Los Angeles is a city spread out over many miles. It is much different than the cities back East.


There is no way a group can control the criminal underground of the city. So many guys leave their safe haven's back East to make a go in California. Most of them fail. The Sica Brothers made it. They controlled a vast criminal empire and they served little to no time in jail.


They were not even made!


Today the make up of the city is comprised of many different ethnic groups. Italians being a very small minority.


The LA Family is small and has chance of ever growing larger. The guys from bigger families back East are out here on their own. They are living off a reputation, but they have no back up.


The families have to many problems and not enough men to send help.


The Colombo family! I posted up about all the wires that the Feds have. These guys are gone!


The tapes do not lie. I find it funny that Joel Cacace is crying about his health and bullet wounds.


What about the Judge and the cop he had shot? Oh they are dead and cannot complain!


This guy killed an innocent Judge who was retired! It was the wrong guy. What an idoit!


Can you expect anymore from some who takes his orders from a Persico?


Then he has guys kill a cop! What a piece of shit. This guy protects people, and then some scumbag kills him because he married the wrong woman.


The Colombo's are low down.


I am sure I will get plenty more threats this week. Attacks on me, my mother, my father etc. Yet still I post.


Nothing is done.


Nothing can change the fact that Allie Boi and Jokey Deross are gone for good and now gay for the stay. Nothing can change the fact that Teddy Persico is a tool that I made look like a bitch.


Kenji OC


Audio cassettes and compact disks containing recordings


of intercepted communications were


previously provided to defendant Cacace as Rule 16 discovery in


the course of United States v. Cacace, et al., Criminal Docket


No. 03-072 (SJ). The communications were intercepted pursuant to


the following orders:


Feb. 1, 1999 (Trager, J.)


March 5, 1999 (Trager, J.)


April 6, 1999 (Trager, J.)


May 7, 1999 (Ross, J.)


May 13, 1999 (Korman, J.)


June 17, 1999 (Ross, J.)


Oral and visual


communications


intercepted at the


Torrese Social Club,


2005 West 8th Street,


Brooklyn, New York


Gioeli,


Calabro


June 14, 1999 (Trager, J.)


July 15, 1999 (Trager, J.)


Aug. 17, 1999 (Trager, J.)


Wire communications


over cellular phone


(917) 653-7236 (used by


Benjamin Castellazzo)


Cacace


Sept. 9, 1999 (Trager, J.) Wire communications


over cellular telephone


(917) 439-5933 (used by


Benjamin Castellazzo)


Cacace


July 25, 2001 (Ross, J.)


Aug. 3, 2001 (Ross, J.)


Aug. 31, 2001 (Korman, J.)


Oct. 9, 2001 (Ross, J.)


Wire communications


over cellular telephone


(718) 791-6661 (used by


Jerry Esposito)


Cacace


Oct. 12, 2001 (Ross, J.)


Nov. 14, 2001 (Ross, J.)


Dec. 14, 2001 (Ross, J.)


Wire communications


over cellular telephone


(718) 781-9973 (used by


Luca DiMatteo)


Cacace


June 11, 2002 (Garaufis,


J.)


July 10, 2002 (Ross, J.)


Wire communications


over cellular telephone


(917) 916-9789 (used by


Luca DiMatteo)


Cacace


All Counsel


March 12, 2009


Page 3


Aug. 30, 2001 (Trager, J.)


Oct. 25, 2001 (Ross, J.)


Nov. 26, 2001 (Ross, J.)


Wire communications


over cellular telephone


(631) 774-5011 (used by


Cacace)


Cacace


Jan. 15, 2002 (Ross, J.)


Feb. 19, 2002 (Ross, J.)


Wire communications


over telephones


(718) 393-6900 and


(718) 393-6901,


associated with Bay


Jewelers, 8607 Bay


Parkway, Brooklyn, New


York 11214


Cacace


May 2, 2002 (Ross, J.)


June 7, 2002 (Johnson, J.)


July 22, 2002 (Ross, J.)


Oral communications


intercepted at Bay


Jewelers, 8607 Bay


Parkway, Brooklyn, New


York 11214


Cacace,


Calabro


Counsel was appointed to represent the defendant, Joel Cacace, in the abovereferenced


matter, pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act.


At the time of Mr. Cacace’s presentment and at his appearances before Hon.


Brian M. Cogan, medical orders and/or directions were issued, together with a request


that government counsel follow up regarding what Mr. Cacace reported was urgently


needed medical attention.1


Following these court appearances, the government, by AUSA Geddis,


attempted to expedited the medical red tape at the MDC, to no avail. Thereafter, the


district court referred Mr. Cacace’s medical concerns to Your Honor. Following an


inquiry by the Court, Mr. Cacace immediately received a medical exam and a blood test.


It has been more than two weeks since the Court’s inquiry, and as of this writing, Mr.


Cacace has not received any follow up medical attention,2 nor has he received the


results of him medical tests.


Mr. Cacace is 68 years old and not in good health. His father died of heart


related difficulties at 65. He reports that he has several bullets in his body and that he.


Mr. Cacace is 68 years old and not in good health. His father died of heart


related difficulties at 65. He reports that he has several bullets in his body and that Mr. Cacace complains of severe pain in his legs and ankles that is often so


painful that he is unable to walk. He reports that his ankles are often so swollen that he


cannot put any weight on his legs at all.


2 Mr. Cacace has received a Rx for an anti-depressant, which he was told could


combat depression and pain. has been stabbed on numerous occasions. He is concerned that the lack of medical


attention may have dire consequences.


Accordingly, counsel respectfully requests that the Court issue an order directing


that Mr. Cacace be seen and evaluated forthwith and that the Court be kept informed of


his medical diagnosis and treatment plan on the 1st and 15th of each month. In


counsel’s experience, nothing short of a specific order by the Court has the potential to


impact on this institution. Alternatively, counsel requests that the Court direct that Mr.Cacace be taken forthwith to a local area hospital for evaluation and diagn


Popout


Original video source (video-play.mp4)


Mar 9, 2009 3:35 PM


Additionally Agent Dobac testified that she attended a number of meetings with Peggy Cutolo including the February 9 2001 meeting with Agent Pontecorvo and Amy Walsh and that she was never informed "about $1

 Peggy Cutolo

from Hollywoodmafia by Jack Whalen


FUCK THE PERSICO FAMILY!


They are weak outside of their two Block's in the shithole Brooklyn that they call home.


I am here LMFAO about what I did to Piggy "Frank" Persico, Teddy Jr, Carmine, Danny and Andre.


R.I.P Bill Cutolo.


The Persico Family are a bunch of petty backstabbing low life's. I hope the Little Gimpy Gnome Carmine has a long stay in the Federal Medical center.


I am sure he has ass problems like some of the other LCN guys locked up.


That is one reason they call him the snake.


I guess this blows the Allie Boi/ Jokey Deross defence of Bill Cutolo is in hiding enjoying his cash. The Petty Persico's did not get enough when they took the hotel and got cash after the war. They had to kill Bill.


These guys are scum. All of them a bunch of cowards.


I hope they find the kid Carmine. That was another cowardly act they committed. The guy gets in a beef so they kill him.


People have to see the area these guys come from. They fight over petty shit. The quickest way to die is to do business with a Persico and have him owe you money.


Take a drive through Brooklyn. Hit Dyker Heights and gaze at the home The Gimp left behind, a Shylock victim paid for that.


Maybe the Government will finally take their "Neverland Ranch" in upstate NY.


There was another funny story in the NY post about some Gambino guys in the Bronx. They were shaking down a hotdog vendor. The LCN is about Honor.


LMFAO Kenji Out! live from Balboa Island in the heart of the OC.


Dear Judge Seybert:


On June 16, 2008, the Court directed the government to provide "information from [ ] witnesses"1 knowledgeable about Marguerite Cutolo’s ("Peggy Cutolo") disclosure of the $1.65 million and the government’s agreement to permit her to retain the money. (See, T. 36) The Court further ordered the government to conduct a search for any documentation pertaining to the alleged disclosure and agreement: "I want you to do a search to see when, if there has been any notation and approval of this


1 The government incorrectly assumed in their submission that the Court directed a single affidavit from Amy Walsh as sufficient to satisfy their obligation "to ascertain whether there is a factual basis for the defendants’ claim" of perjury. (See, government June 30, 2008 letter at page 4) As noted infra, the Court directed information from "witnesses" aware of the disclosure and involved in the agreement to permit Peggy Cutolo to retain the $165 million. (See, transcript pages 35-36 of the June 16, 2008 court appearance, hereafter referred to with the letter "T").


Case 1:04-cr-00911-JS Document 687 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 1 of 5 2


process." (See, T. 36) In response to the Court’s direction, the government has submitted a vague, inconclusive and misleading affidavit from former Assistant U.S. Attorney Amy Walsh erroneously claiming that her factual assertions "defeats the defendants’ speculative claim that [Peggy Cutolo and Agent Gary Pontecorvo] committed perjury" in regard to the disclosure of the $1.65 million. To the contrary, we respectfully submit that an evidentiary hearing will clearly show that Peggy Cutolo and Agent Pontecorvo lied regarding the disclosure of the $1.65 million.


Background


During cross-examination, Barbara Jean Cardinale ("Cardinale") first disclosed the existence of the $1 plus million and the fact that her mother was permitted to retain the funds. (Pages 410 and 516-17 of trial transcript hereafter referred to with the letters "TT"). After the surprised disclosure of the existence of the money, the government elicited on direct from Cardinale’s mother Peggy Cutolo that she disclosed the existence of the $1.65 million to Agent Pontecorvo and Ms. Walsh "when she first spoke with the government." (TT.


623-24; 697-98) Peggy Cutolo testified that she was permitted to keep the money by the government. (TT. 698) Later during cross-examination, Peggy Cutolo confirmed that she disclosed the existence of the $1.65 million to the government "during [her] meeting [in] February." (TT. 963)


The meeting with Pontecorvo and Ms. Walsh occurred on February 9, 2001. (TT. 665-66 and 695-698) A review of the rough notes of this meeting, provided to the defense as Exhibit 3500-MEC-5, failed to reflect any mention of the $1.65 million.


Agent Stephanie Dobuc testified that she, along with Agent Pontecorvo, assisted in relocating the Cutolo family from Staten Island to "some other location," and though she met and spoke often with Peggy Cutolo, Agent Dobac was never told that Peggy Cutolo had $1.65 million. Additionally, Agent Dobac testified that she attended a number of meetings with Peggy Cutolo, including the February 9, 2001 meeting with Agent Pontecorvo and Amy Walsh, and that she was never informed "about $1.65 million that [Peggy Cutolo] had in cash." (TT. 4929-30)


Case 1:04-cr-00911-JS Document 687 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 2 of 5 3


In an apparent effort to corroborate Peggy’ Cutolo’s assertion that she disclosed the existence of the $1.65 million to the government, Agent Pontecorvo testified that "while we were getting [the Cutolos] out of the area, or when we arrived in the new area," either Barbara Jean Cardinale or Peggy Cutolo "advised that they had some cash." (TT. 5201) "As soon as [he] realized – before [he] learned of the amount, as soon as [he] knew Mrs. Cutolo had some large amount of cash, [he] advised the US Attorney’s Office." (TT. 5294-95).


 Peggy Cutolo

Later when the Cutolo’s were still at the safe house sometime between January 2001 and May 2001, Agent Pontecorvo learned that Peggy Cutolo had "like $1.65 million" from her husband’s illegal activities. (TT. 5292-94). Agent Pontecorvo believed that he did not "document, in a 302 or elsewhere, that [he was] aware of $1.6 plus million in cash in the possession of the Cutolo family." (TT. 5295)


Amy Walsh Affidavit


As directed by the Court during the June 16, 2008 appearance, the government submitted an affidavit from then-Assistant U.S. Attorney Amy Walsh ("Walsh Affidavit") in an effort to overcome the allegations that Peggy Cutolo and Agent Pontecorvo lied regarding the disclosure of the $1.65 million. Instead of clarifying the factual misrepresentations, the Walsh Affidavit raises more disturbing questions about the issue and the government’s treatment of the defense allegations.


In vague and equivocal terms, Ms. Walsh recalled, "[a]t some point at or around the time Marguerite Cutolo was relocated," becoming aware from an unidentified source "that [she] had told the FBI that she was in possession of a large amount of cash." (See, Walsh Affidavit at paragraph 2) In her only meeting with Peggy Cutolo on February 9, 2001, Ms. Walsh did not recall whether the "cash" was a topic of discussion. (Walsh Affidavit at Paragraph 3) A review of the February 9, 2001 notes of the meeting clearly demonstrate that Ms.


Walsh’s recollection is questionable because money belonging to Peggy Cutolo’s husband was discussed, but not the $1.65 million. On the eighth page of the notes, Peggy Cutolo recounted showing $70,000 to $80,000 to John J. DeRoss:


Case 1:04-cr-00911-JS Document 687 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 3 of 5 4


[t]here’s got to be money in the house . . .


She showed him box w/ $70-80,000 and documents


. . . she said I found this he said there’s


gotta be more.


However, as previously noted, there clearly was no discussion about $1.65 million, a fact deliberately withheld from the government by Peggy Cutolo.


Without any recollection of the amount of money involved and again without identifying the persons involved, Ms. Walsh stated that "[a]t some point later in 2001, the government decided to not seek forfeiture of, or taxes on, the funds." (Walsh Affidavit at paragraph 4).


Hearing Requested


Instead of clarifying the factual dispute, the government submission has sought to resolve the issue with a vague and inconclusive affidavit from Amy Walsh. Though Ms. Walsh could not recall "whether the cash . . . was a topic of discussion during the [February 9, 2001] meeting," the notes reflected that Peggy Cutolo had, in fact, disclosed the existence of $70,000 to $80,000 of illicit proceeds.


Is this the "large amount of cash" referred to in Ms. Walsh’s affidavit?


According to Ms. Walsh, she recalled being informed from an unknown source that "Marguerite Cutolo had told the FBI that she was in possession of a large amount of cash found in the Cutolo home." Is this money different from the $70,000 to $80,000, and, if so, how much was actually involved? Are there any notes or documentation to clarify this critical point? Certainly, if the government was going to forego forfeiture and taxes on the racketeering proceeds, the government must have some record of the amount, and certainly must have documentation to demonstrate the approval process as noted by the Court in its request for documentary support of the agreement between the government and Peggy Cutolo permitting her and her family to retain the illicit moneys. (See, T. 36)


The only conclusion from the government’s submission and their failure to provide records of the agreement is that Peggy Cutolo withheld the existence of the $1.65 million from the government and that Agent Pontecorvo lied to bolster a key


Case 1:04-cr-00911-JS Document 687 Filed 07/08/2008 Page 4 of 5 5


prosecution witness whose credibility had been severely shaken during trial.


In her affidavit Ms. Walsh stated that "[a]t some point later in 2001, the government decided to not seek forfeiture of, or taxes on, the funds." (Walsh Affidavit at Paragraph 4) What funds? Is it the $70,000 to $80,000 disclosed during the February 9, 2001 meeting with Amy Walsh and other law enforcement officials? Is it some other amount?


If so, how much? Who in "the government" authorized the Cutolo’s to retain the money? Where is the documentation of the approval process and agreement? Based upon Amy Walsh’s vague and inconclusive allegations, the appropriate question seems to be whether the government actually "looked" to find evidence of such an agreement?


If the government did not search for such records, then the question becomes why not? And If they did, and failed to uncover such documentation, the logical conclusion is that "no" such agreement existed regarding the alleged disclosure of the $1.65 million. Why is the government "stonewalling" a factual resolution of the allegations of perjury?


A hearing is necessary to resolve these questions and to determine whether a factual basis exists for the defendants’ allegations of perjury.


Conclusion


Based upon the above arguments, an evidentiary hearing to determine the true acts behind the government’s agreement with Peggy Cutolo is necessary. If the Court agrees with our position, we respectfully request that two critical witnesses Amy Walsh and Agent Pontecorvo be initially called in an effort to resolve the disputed issues.2


Respectfully submitted,


Oct 13, 2008 6:13 PM


The crazy thing?

because Bill

from Hollywoodmafia by Jack Whalen


The La Cosa Nostra. This Blog is all about information. I post court papers and letters so that people can see what these guys are up too. The life is not what it seems. It is not a good life.


I get plenty of emails and plenty of posts that make these guys seem great. People always point to guys like Carlo Gambino or Tony Arcardo. They are the exception to the rule.


The rest die locked away far away from their loved ones. The Organized Crime landscape has changed. The LCN no longer has a lock on anything.


Today I am posting up papers on John Baudanza or John Goggles. John is a nice guy. He is smart and just a pleasant guy to be around. Yet he is locked away for many years.


He will miss all the time with his kids as they grow up. It is a waste and a shame. JB could have done anything with his life.


He chose to follow in his father and Uncles footsteps. Carmine or Mr c was always in trouble and JB had a rough home life. Joe B has a hard family life. Jb married into the Luchese family and that might have saved his life.


The days and nights he spent with Scopo will not be forgotten. JB took a plea and got 15 more months. There are now three more guys on his case who flipped.


This could be bad for JB.


The crazy thing? I think being locked up saved JBs life. He was eating and drinking himself into an early grave.


Take a step back and look at how many guys will go down for killing Bill Cutolo. All those guys for nothing. All that because Bill might have done something. What a waste. There are so many spin off cases because of that and more informants everyday.


Even me and what I did was because of Bill's death. The Business I was in was a top priority for the Feds.


It was all a waste.


Kenji OC


Re: United States v. Sperber, et al.


Criminal Docket No. 08-97 (BMC)


Dear Counsel:


Pursuant to Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, the government hereby


provides notice of our intention to introduce certain evidence during the trial in the abovereferenced


matter, which is currently scheduled to begin on or shortly after April 13, 2009.


Specifically, the government intends to offer evidence that your client (1) conspired with others


to burglarize certain residences on Long Island and (2) assisted an individual in collecting a


loansharking debt owed to that individual. In our March 20 pretrial motion filing, we will more


fully describe these uncharged crimes, and explain why they are admissible both as direct proof


of the crimes charged in the indictment and as Rule 404(b) evidence.


Mar 16, 2009 3:40 PM